So now let

On Sunday, March 2 will again grant Oscars, the most important event this year, and the whole world therefore can not nap in anticipation of one of the nominees will receive of that gilded baldy. This tense groping but not at all out of place because the winner actually know now. They are the famous acceptance speeches academics is usually acceptance speeches more predictable than most Hollywood action films.
So now let's look at it together, who have now can congratulate and try to explain why this is so. If you would like to know a little wider context, see these articles about Hollywood misogyny, racism and homophobia.
Did you know that among academics - those people from the film industry, whose votes decide who wins an Oscar - just 2% of people with swarthy? That comes from 80% of men? And most of them belong to older generations? I hate throwing all academics in one bag and called them racist homophobic bigotry, but with regard to this information is not so surprising that a number of nominees look the way they look: white and every year almost as well.
Just look at the list of nominees look good: last year, the media gave the label "Year of Black Movies" and to not. Last year went into distribution in addition to 12 years in chains and dramas Mandela, 42, Komorník or Fruitvale - movies, which were at the time of placing the word "Oscar" acceptance speeches inflected in all cases. Through it all, the Academy noted that only one drama where African Americans - coincidentally acceptance speeches again - suffer, cry and excavated at the bottom of society are dying in droves. That academics would have preferred acceptance speeches this film because in them a sense of "white acceptance speeches guilt" acceptance speeches over the others?
Whatever the case, this township dramas in nine nominated to replace images such as Nebraska (which no one has yet seen and perhaps half a dozen nominations), dirty tricks (which, although well played acceptance speeches by actors, but by itself it is a film entirely average and certainly not the best for the whole year) or Wolf of Wall Street (before which most critics agree that it is all a bit of a one - albeit relatively fun - Brdo). All three films are bland, but play them in predominantly white, so they are closer Academics. This is perhaps understandable, but when I last looked into the calendar, sixties was long gone.
In the acting categories, although due to political correctness has become a tradition to nominate at least one dark-skinned man, but they are there mainly to have exhausted the quota Academy of diversity. Nominated artists usually win anything. Just look at this year's Golden Globes.
And why that part of the best writing about film acting categories? Because it is very unlikely that they will eat the actors and actresses in them - Lupita Nyong'o, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Barkhad Abdi - won. And precisely because of that famous Academy Awards Oscar film 12 years in chains. Not so much because he was the best, but because if it did, pulled apart by the avalanche of criticism of racial discrimination. That is only at the stage blacks appear only once - Phew! - But critics will have gagged that you will carry equal prize "most important".
Where in this category won a cabbage white, it would be good for the Academy foul. In essence, the decision is between Cuarón, who would become the first Latino what would win the Oscar for best director, and McQueen, the first African-American, what would win the Oscar for directing. A That would have been great publicity, is not it? The year is 2014, America's roughly 40% of non-white and these milestones are still unsurpassed.
Eventually it will win but just Cuarón. Why? McQueen because he gets an Oscar for best film. And besides, is gay - not just to the eye as Jared Leto Club last hope, but in reality. And this lack is his British nationality - which the Academy likes, because the British in the ceremony brings little ears - just short.
The rest of the nominees are there just to count: Lots of nominations have their own films and actors in them and the Academy in recent years, fond of simplicity. Academics do not have to watch many of the shots, and that in all not too much hockey audience, is selected each year only a handful of films, which are then nominate almost all categories. (The other side of the coin is then the fact that not every film has a studio that was willing to pump money into piles that for academics organized a private screening, they dispatched, DVDs, sent them all the actors and the way ahead of myself and climbed them in the ass. But more on that in a minute ...) I plan to have eight films nominated for nine statues, not so much because they would cost in each such category merit, but because it is easier, clearer and more pleasant for academics .
Derna nobody knows and so can be happy that he got thanks to a good campaign acceptance speeches for the film, at least the nomination. Ejiofor is black, so you also can let go taste - in this category is just that, it was at least "the one required a black man." DiCaprio probably nom